From: "U.S. EPA" <usaepa@govdelivery.com>
February 10, 2011
To: anne.kamansky@verizon.net
EPA News Release (HQ): EPA Removes Confidentiality Claims on Studies of Chemicals Submitted under TSCA

CONTACT
Dale Kemery
kemery.dale@epa.gov  (News Media Only)
202-564-7839
202-564-4355
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 10, 2011


EPA Removes Confidentiality Claims on Studies of Chemicals Submitted under TSCA
Action part of ongoing commitment to transparency

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has notified five companies that the identities of 14 chemicals associated with a number of health and safety studies submitted under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and claimed as confidential are not eligible for confidential treatment. The action comes as part of Administrator Lisa P. Jackson’s continued efforts to increase public access to chemical information to help Americans understand risks posed by chemicals in our environment.

Last year, EPA put in place a plan to review confidentiality claims for the name of chemicals addressed in health and safety studies. Under these new procedures EPA is moving to declassify many chemical identities so they are no longer secret. More chemical names connected with health and safety studies will be released in the future. The agency plans to deny confidentiality claims for chemical identity in health and safety studies provided to the agency under TSCA unless the chemical identity contains process or mixture information that is expressly protected by the law.
“The public deserves access to critical health and safety information on chemicals, but if the name of the chemical is kept secret in the health and safety report, the information is of no real value to people,” said Steve Owens, EPA’s assistant administrator for the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. “We are committed to increasing the American people’s access to this important information.”

Under TSCA, companies may claim that information they submit to EPA should be treated as confidential business information (CBI) and not be disclosed to the public. Companies that manufacture, process, or distribute chemicals are required to immediately provide notice to EPA if they learn that a chemical presents a substantial risk of injury to health or the environment. The reports are made available on EPA’s website, but when the identity of the chemical has been claimed confidential by a company, the name of the chemical has been removed from the copy of the report that is made public.

EPA has begun reviewing past CBI claims for chemical identity in health and safety studies. Where EPA determines that the information is not eligible for confidential treatment under the law, the agency will notify companies of the determination and that EPA will make the information public on the 31st day after receiving the determination unless the company challenges the disclosure in federal court.
More information on EPA’s efforts to increase transparency, for a copy of the letter, and additional information on the notifications on declassifications: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/transparency.html


You can view or update your subscriptions or e-mail address at any time on your Subscriber Preferences Page. All you will need is your e-mail address. If you have any questions or problems e-mail support@govdelivery.com  for assistance.
This service is provided to you at no charge by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

 
No disclosure to housewives on glycol ether:  *

You can help, contact Congress  *

 

Glycol Ether should be disclosed in all products, including our medications

 www.valdezlink.com/re/drugs/list.htm

 

ALL glycol ether in any products should be disclosed *  Tell Congress!

 


EPA - CA Janitorial Study http://www.westp2net.org/janitorial/tools/haz2.htm <---link
What else does EGBE do? *  <--link-

 

Some companies do not disclose ingredients of Pepper Spray.  90% - 98% is not cyan pepper.  Is Pepper Spray unnecessarily used in training Police & Troopers & Military Boot Camps in our Nation? * *

 

I hope that includes companies such as those who make Clean Shower.  They do not disclose.

Information ALL doctors need:

2-Butoxy Ethanol is unquestionably Health Hazardous (part of the family of glycol ethers, etc)

We need new disclosure laws
http://www.valdezlink.com/re/2-butoxyethanolhazardous.htm

Track CFIDS symptoms & see if this chemical isn't the root cause of CJD, ALS, autoimmune issues or cancers

I would like military to look for exposure to 2-butoxyethanol or glycol butyl ethers when soldiers come down with 'the flu' as these 3 soldiers did before they died thereafter, 2005
http://www.valdezlink.com/re/3soldiersdieafterflu05.htm 

M. Diann Hursh, Box 233, Valdez, AK 99686

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE VIA INTERNET COMMUNICATION IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.

3-18-11

Copyright © 2002 - 2011 Margaret Diann Hursh

except for any previously copyrighted material - Fair Use