What does 2-butoxyethanol do, when too strong in products such as Inipol EAP 22 and Corexit 9527?
|
Open Letter
to - Hematologists - Endocrinologists -
Nephrologists
-
Oncologists
- Urologists - Neurologists
I have been learning about what appears
to be the chemical
poisoning of approx 1,000 bioremediation workers of the Exxon Valdez
Oil Spill cleanup (plus many more who were nearby doing other jobs)
and am concerned that the hemolytic anemia they all would have had at
that time, Aug/Sept, 1989 has not since been detected by doctors (of
most workers I've spoken with).
Since it doesn't go away, it must still be there & underlie any
future complications that come along. Are they only
getting computer results of blood counts & no one is looking at
the red blood cells under a microscope? Or do they have too many
juvenile red blood cells ... or just don't have enough blood in the first
place? Has the normal range of blood counts changed in the past
15 years? Or does hemolytic anemia caused from solvents
'look-like' borderline normal blood (until you take a closer look)?
Are there any cures for hemolytic
anemia? I have not heard of any. When blood counts are
given, does a juvenile blood cell count as much as a mature blood
cell? What should be the ratio of each? What is the normal
'volume' of blood (MCV) ?
I believe that since it goes undetected
today, many who collapse & are thought to have a stroke or heart
attack, may actually be collapsing from lack of blood in their bodies.
Do you know how many workers of the
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill cleanup you have seen? It would be a good
question to ask about. The most damaging chemical they
encountered was 2-butoxyethanol. The information about it says
that it causes damage to the blood (hemolytic anemia caused from
solvents), the bone marrow & all blood forming organs; also it
defats the skin, causes severe central nervous system damage (short
term memory loss, difficulty concentrating, depression, suicidal tendencies)
and targets the kidneys and liver with multiple cancers possible.
Reproductive damage also. Pretty
much the same symptoms
as that of Gulf War Syndrome, which could also have
been caused from the same chemical at that war's end. www.valdezlink.com/wondering.htm
I have talked to workers (or relatives
of those deceased) who have multiple symptoms such as:
Many other exposures to this chemical
are possible, it can affect workers in the car painting business,
plastics and dry cleaning business, and multiple other products used
by mechanics, home hobby crafts and cleaning agents at home and
commercially. www.valdezlink.com/opinion.htm
Recently a native man who is in contact with one of
the attorneys for the fishermen told me that "as of 1995 there have
been 890 natives who had claims & were deceased." Altogether
there were approx 11,000 workers on the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill
cleanup.
Since solvents are to some degree 'thrown off' thru the respiratory system, I wonder whether a spouse could be exposed -secondarily - or a chiropractor who had seen multiple workers immediately after 1989 - also exposed 'second hand?' Did you know that Gulf War Syndrome Vets are puzzled about spouses coming down with the same symptoms they have? Did you know that Walter Reid Medical Hospital for vets finds no more hemolytic anemia in that population than in the general population? If they were specifically looking for hemolytic anemia, I believe they would find it. Exxon was specifically looking for hemolytic anemia, it appears, and they did find it in 1989. Sincerely, M. Diann Hursh Diann Hursh, PO Box 233, Valdez, Alaska 99686 1-888-853-5333 Do you know what these workers & their doctors want more than anything? An accurate diagnosis... and an effective treatment. Don't we owe them that much? Can't we help the next worker force not to be health damaged like this? Do you know how much 2-butoxyethanol is in Exxon's Corexit now? Look it up. Some folks think 2-butoxyethanol is thrown off & no harm done; what a fallacy! Wouldn't it be nice if long term effects of exposure never 'kicked-in?' I've heard of the studies on rats - humans have already been over-exposed - see what happened to them! Does a rat live long enough to see what the cumulative effects really are? May the truth about this chemical C6H14O2/CH3(CH2)2CH2OCH2CH2OH come out ... & people will be more careful with it. . . treat it like the poison that it is. Is it true -that if extremely high blood pressure started right after strong exposure to 2-butoxyethanol - it could be an indication of renal dysfunction or kidney problems? ... instead of other more common causes?
If so would the regular blood pressure medication be harmful? These are supposed to avoid chemicals, including medication drugs, as much as possible for the rest of their lives. (An axiom of chemical overexposure/poisoning) Mayo Clinic noted a toxic overload of medication for one woman who washed the gear during EVOS What should be done? Helps - Doctor Comments, please 7-25-03 July 15, 2003 Lay General Comments on 'borderline' normal blood counts * Lay General Comments on Kidneys * Lay comments - General Military personnel concerns with birth defects * RE: 2-butoxyethanol - For Doctors to consider & this Research |
When do you have enough 'symptoms' to suspect 2-butoxyethanol?