Concern about Rising Gas Prices .... shares the public:
Subject:* Be Proactive against high gas prices!

I don't normally deal with subjects like this, but I've had about all I can take of the "right out in front of God and everybody" price-gouging, rip-off, while the petroleum companies thumb their noses at us and smile

- because they are convinced, there is absolutely nothing we can do about it. 

Well, think again! A gentleman by the name of Phillip Hollsworth has offered an idea much stronger than any that's been tried in the past. The message below is the result of applying his idea to my personal mailing list. Do yourself a favor and invest a moment or two in something that could have a major impact on your wallet - and the nation's economy.

Respectfully,
Rev. Charles Stanley

 

Subject: RE: Gas prices I hear we are going to hit close to $3.00 a gallon in some parts of the country before the year is over. Want gasoline prices to come down? We need to take some intelligent, united action.

This makes MUCH MORE SENSE than the "don't buy gas on a certain Day" campaign that was going around last April or May! The oil companies just laughed at that because they knew we wouldn't continue to "hurt" ourselves by refusing to buy gas. It was more of an inconvenience to us than it was a problem for them. BUT, this is a plan that can really work.

 

Please read it and join with us!

 

By now you're probably thinking gasoline priced at about $1.50 is super cheap. Me too! It is currently $1.97 for regular unleaded in my town. (California) Now that the oil companies and the OPEC nations have Conditioned us to think that the cost of a gallon of gas is CHEAP at $1.50- $1.75, we need to take aggressive action to teach them that BUYERS control the marketplace--not sellers. With the price of gasoline going up more each day, we consumers need to take action. The only way we are going to see the price of gas come down is if we hit someone in the pocketbook that WITHOUT hurting ourselves. How? Since we all rely on our cars, we can't just stop buying gas. But we CAN have an impact on gas prices if we all act together to force a Price war.

 

Here's the idea:

 

For the rest of this year, DON'T purchase ANY gasoline from The two biggest companies (which now are one), EXXON and MOBIL. If they are not selling any gas, they will be inclined to reduce their prices. If they reduce their prices, the other companies will have to follow suit. But to have an impact, we need to reach literally millions of Exxon and Mobil gas buyers. It's really simple to do!! Now, don't wimp out on me at this point--keep reading and I'll explain how simple it is to reach millions of people!!

I am sending this note to 1826 people. If each of you send it to at

least ten more (1826 x 10 = 18,260) and those 18,260 send it to at least ten more (18,260 x 10 = 182,600) and so on, by the time the message reaches the sixth generation of people, we will have reached over ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY TWO MILLION, SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND consumers! . ...

 

If those people get excited and pass this on to ten friends each, just one more time, then we will have reached nearly TWO BILLION PEOPLE. WE CAN HAVE AN IMPACT!!! But, in order to do so, you have to keep the ball rolling by sending this to 10 people. That's all. How long would all of this take?  

 

If each person follows through within one day of receipt, conceivably, within the next 8 days EXXON and MOBIL would be at the point of utter desperation!

I'll bet you didn't think you and I had that much potential, did you?

Acting together we can make a difference. If this makes sense to you, please pass this message on.

PLEASE HOLD OUT UNTIL THEY LOWER THEIR PRICES AND KEEP THEM DOWN. THIS CAN REALLY WORK. YOU KNOW THEY LOVE HOLIDAYS AND SUMMER TRAVELERS    I live in a small town of only 573 people. In addition to sending this out, I am going to start talking to my computer-less friends about supporting this effort. Now what is next?   Share with those who read your e-mails!

 

Most of all - Give your opinion to your US Senators and Representative

Your Opinion Matters!

 

In the Case of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill 

US Congress banned the Exxon Valdez from US Ports

& no court nor EPA has had any effect on that

What You Think & Share with your Congress  

- Matters More than ANYTHING!

 

Do you agree?  

 

But, It wasn't the ship's fault         - Hung out to dry        Song words/music

The Evos Photo Story *

The People *

 

http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/1996/104-3/forum.html#ehpnet

Consider this

EHPnet

Reliance on petroleum comes with a price. Because of spills, such as the Exxon Valdez, and the numerous barrels of oil that leak from petroleum pipelines, cleaning up petroleum-polluted water and soil is big business. The most common mechanical remediation techniques involve drumming, transportation, and remote disposal of contaminated soil and water to special dump sites and treatment plants.

Recently, an alternative technique called bioremediation has been developed. Bioremediation is the process of using a mix of living microorganisms, nutrients, and biological catalysts to rapidly break down hydrocarbons in soil or water into nonhazardous, nonregulated, organic fertilizer-like compounds. Bioremediation methods are estimated to be five to ten times less expensive than mechanical methods of remediation.

A World Wide Web site dedicated to bioremediation was created by Oettco Products Corporation, a company specializing in petroleum-oxidizing products. The site provides an overall explanation of bioremediation methods, materials, and techniques that have been used by professional bioremediation contractors over the last fifteen years. The topics outlined include basic concepts, typical commercial bioremediation materials, the bioremediation industry, safety issues, soil remediation topics, eliminating absorbed petroleum, cleaning coastal soil, and oil slicks on open water.

Bioremediation is not only used to clean up petroleum spills, but is also used to support basic sanitation infrastructures. Algae have been used to treat waste water for over a century, but only recently have certain algae species been actively cultivated to "digest waste." These methods are cost effective and produce little waste, as the leftover algae can be dried and used as fertilizer. Bioremediation methodology and techniques may provide a more environmentally sound way to help clean up the environment.


[Table of Contents]

Last update: May15, 1997

Links to above article are webmaster's

Come to Alaska - Where everything is BIG

Dear Tom Goehl
Editor-in-Chief, EHP on-line
 
First of all, I noticed these EHP on-line articles
and found them interesting
Could I link to them if I work up web pages on the topics?
Such as valdezlink.com/pages/laxatives.htm (just now 'roughed out')
I was speaking with a man yesterday who says that eating natural, unheated honey every day means you won't need a laxative.
Maybe I can get more information from him.  He lives in Palmer, Alaska
 
 
Second-
How can water supply be tested for 2-butoxyethanol?
Best thing to do if there is another oil spill?
Nothing except skim the oil!

Let the winter storms break up the oil 

- But USE NO CHEMICALS  strong in 2-butoxyethanol

C6H14O2/CH3(CH2)2CH2OCH2CH2OH

    to abbreviated web contents - Exxon Valdez Oil Spill -  workers     

It is cautioned that it not be near streams  valdezlink.com/inipol/pages/symptoms.htm#2-b
 
 
We need to know how to find the common denominator in the blood damage from this chemical, too. valdezlink.com/evos/seeking.htm  
 
It is being used more and more and the damage to humans is becoming pandemic.... valdezlink.com/valdez_evos_photos.htm#more 
 but how to show it?    Certainly there is a common denominator? 
The blood is damaged first, but it is hard to test for when it is acquired hemolytic anemia from this solvent.
 
Prescription drugs are harmful for these overexposed to chemicals, and doctors don't seem to realize that, or even what they're dealing with 
 
There are many industries & even home-makers affected by 2-butoxyethanol www.valdezlink.com/hi.htm
 
Look at the human tragedy in the Chenega, Alaska village
 
 
Sincerely,
Margaret Hursh
PO Box 233
Valdez, AK 99686
907-835-5333

 

Quoting thoughts from this publication, also

Do you use too much laxatives?  It could be cancer causing 

valdezlink.com/pages/laxatives.htm

 

What's Causing Parkinson's?

http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/1996/104-3/forum.html#what's

The cause of Parkinson's disease has baffled doctors ever since this chronic neurological syndrome was first described by James Parkinson in 1817. Now scientists may finally be closing in on the culprits. The disease is likely to be caused by "some admixture of genetic predisposition, aging, and exposure to environmental toxicants," says Doyle Graham, chair of the pathology department at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville.

Sorting out multiple potential causal agents and the interactions among them will never be easy. However, thanks to increasingly sophisticated research techniques, it may now be possible. A prime example of the kind of meticulously designed research needed for this purpose is a case-control study currently being completed at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit. "This is one of only two population-based studies to date in Parkinson's epidemiology, and it's the only one of which I'm aware in which an industrial hygienist's assessment of exposures, based on detailed occupational histories, has been used," says Jay M. Gorell, lead investigator and director of the hospital's Parkinson's disease center.

The study, now in the final data analysis stage, included 144 Parkinson's patients and 469 control subjects who were matched for age, race, and sex. Preliminary analyses, based on all but 10 of the patients and all but six of the controls, suggest an increased risk of Parkinson's disease associated with exposure to manganese, copper, and lead, as well as exposure to herbicides and insecticides used at work. However, it may take some combination of factors to produce Parkinson's disease. "It's possible that an agent might act in a cumulative way over time to partially disable a cell, but it might take several agents together to cause the cell either to fail to function or to die prematurely," says Gorell.

While some researchers are devoting their energies to determining which environmental agents contribute to Parkinson's disease, others are more concerned with discovering how they do so. The spectrum of possibilities ranges "from the enhanced metabolism of substances into their toxic form to the diminished protection of cells from these kinds of toxic products," says Graham. One hypothesis he is pursuing relates to the potential role of transition metals, such as manganese. Manganese poisoning produces symptoms similar to Parkinson's disease, although it affects a different site in the brain. Graham and his colleague, Thomas Montino, are currently studying the effect of transition metals on neuroglial cells in tissue culture.

Graham and others believe that transition metals may contribute to the oxidation of catecholamines, compounds that carry signals between nerve cells. One way that catecholamines are destroyed is by the action of the enzyme monoamine oxidase that results in the production of hydrogen peroxide, a known toxic compound. Catecholamine oxidation can also occur by metal-catalyzed processes that produce their own toxic by-products. Of course, cells have to cope with such natural toxins on a regular basis, so they develop the ability to protect themselves from cellular damage with enzymes that destroy toxins. However, if the rate of toxin production is increased or the ability of a cell to protect itself is lessened, this could lead to cellular injury over time.

As research presents new evidence for a link between environmental agents and Parkinson's disease, still other scientists are trying to understand how such factors may interact with a given individual's genetic makeup. The most likely scenario seems to be that a person can inherit a predisposition to develop the disease that is only later activated by a toxic exposure. For example, "a person may have a genetic defect in the body machinery that deals with a toxic compound, but if that person doesn't ever come across this toxic agent, he may never develop the disease," says Donato Di Monte, director of biochemical toxicology at the Parkinson's Institute in Sunnyvale, California.

One major obstacle to all Parkinson's research, however, is the lack of an objective test to diagnose the condition. At present, diagnosis is based on the clinical assessment of a given patient's symptoms, a method that can be inaccurate. The often conflicting results of many older Parkinson's studies may, in fact, be partly due to a lack of standardization in diagnostic criteria. Di Monte is among the scientists now searching for biological markers of Parkinson's disease, in the hopes of one day developing a simple, reliable test for the condition. Some of his work is aimed at studying the products of oxidative metabolism in spinal fluid.

The picture of Parkinson's remains complicated. Says Di Monte, "We have to start looking at the interactions between environmental and genetic factors. And among the environmental factors, we have to start looking at interactions between neurotoxins. Naturally, we would like to have a simple experimental model, but unfortunately that may not be feasible with Parkinson's disease."

More thoughts on Parkinson's

Compiled 9-26-03