Our distributor in Pakistan is trying to get through to the right people, but politics is in his way.

Any way you can get grass roots objections might get our product considered,

but they are more likely to continue, if they have already purchased their product.

Our CF 5100 will make the beaches just as clean, but it will actually DEGRADE the petroleum.

If they are worried about surfactant in the ocean, we have another product,

same bugs plus more, that has less surfactant in it

(but theirs is ALL surfactant, so that should not matter).

Our other product is Alken Clear-Flo 7139 http://www.alken-murray.com/7139pib.htm

We used natural humified soil extract to enhance remediation for that product, 

but its a bit slower at cleaning than CF 5100 is -

but MUCH safer for fish etc. since it does not contain large amounts of surfactant to SUFFOCATE the fish.

The Exxon product can suffocate fish - no surfactant is fish friendly,

just a matter of how long it takes to break down and which is worse - oil or surfactant.

Both suffocate fish, so we minimize that,

but CF 5100 would give them the "fast cleanup" appearance

with less danger than the 2-butoxyethanol.