You've
heard of Melaleuca? 
The Tub 'n Tile will not give out an MSDS. They say the
surfactant is proprietary. You know what I think it is. You might be
able to get an MSDS 2002 or before, but since then products that did
report the chemical there don't
have to now (& usually they didn't anyway, because all
they have to do is to tell you how to use it properly - OR claim
'proprietary') |
|
| . | |
| Audrey got ahold of me for her husband's exposure to misting Simple Green for 45 minutes at work. He must have died, because she was very interested & now no reply. You probably know that the company claims Simple Green is non toxic. They use Dow Chemical's trade name for 2-butoxyethanol: Butyl Cellosolve. They base their claim on a diluted test of the the product (about a capful in a half gallon of water) and THEREFORE state because it is too diluted, it is not toxic. The gallon size container offers a full strength choice of use ... and no change in warnings. Personally I think that is negligent failure to warn. Simple Green is used in our Nation's penitentiaries almost exclusively. | |
|
I had a Col in the USAF call me. He was concerned about his having trouble breathing after cleaning his bath tub for 15 minutes using Simple Green |
|
were used during the Exxon Valdez oil spill cleanup I believe there are products which should have better 'warnings' & without so, would be considered as negligent failure to warn.
|
|
|
Will Martha Stewart be Healthy when she is out of the Pen? |
|
| . | |
|
Notice that
the paint companies in the last couple of years have added some
warnings on their paint (I couldn't find any about 3 years ago)
When asked which ethylene glycol they were referencing the company
refused to tell me. You know what I suspect.
For a decade the paint companies had
been sued for the lead in paint; they always won, per info I found.
However, they became savy about adequate warnings. They knew
what chemical was harmful in paint. And they didn't want to be
sued for the real chemical of harm ... so they posted some warnings
(better than a suit for 'negligent failure to warn')
It's not
ingestion that's the problem (who would drink paint, anyway?)
|
|
|
|