To EPA  1-6-03

Regarding
http://www.epa.gov/oilspill/ncp/corex950.htm

 

It originated 8-1-89  * with ethylene oxide (a carcinogen) as the only identified ingredient.  6-14-92 it only identified 2-butoxyethanol

 

And now we have no idea?

Sounds very similar to Inipol EAP 22 which was 10-12% by weight of 2-butoxyethanol.

It is clear that this had so little nitrogen and phosphorus in it as to only be a 'fertilizer' technically.  IT was a surfactant much like 'Spray 'n Wash'   (But Corexit consists of 38% 2-butoxyethanol?)

 

It harmed hundreds of men during Exxon Valdez Oil Spill cleanup... but no one wants to know; they are blood damaged with hemolytic anemia.  Right away they show the low red blood cell anemia, skin damage and central nervous system damage.... then many seem to get kidney damage leading to kidney failure.... & dying off 

Cancers from overexposure to 2-butoxyethanol?  No one wants to know, or they could follow these hundreds of men & KNOW what cancer effects they have more than the general population!

What a loss to science! 

 

 Dumping Corexit in the ocean now as an experiment...serves no purpose.

In cold water experts will tell you that it hangs around ... without even biodegrading.

 

& we won't even know what people are exposed to, either?

How does 409 Cleaner * Compare to Exxon's Corexit?  *

Some Thoughts *