Would you want this
corexit chemical dumped in our Alaska waters... ?
Exxon didn't test the
chemicals before using them during oil spill cleanup ...
& probably know they
are no good even now, so why 'practice on Alaska?"
...and what workers would
be needed ?
& what gear would they
be provided?
Will this damage more
workers' lives?
no bioremediating or
biodegrading at 4 degrees C & lower...
This is well known in chemical and
bioremediation circles...
So WHY are they dumping chemicals (&
wanting to dump more chemicals) that will be held in suspended animation with
all their deadly effects... into Alaska waters .... ?
such as the herring ran into in 1993 ?
The scientists didn't know what was in the chemicals or they would have likely
concluded what I did:
A theory on what is happening to the steller sea
lion population decline since 1950s is that there is probably a correlation as
to what countries that border their ocean currents are dumping into the
waters... biologists could take a fat biopsy of the animals & send it to a
lab that specifically tests for residual chemicals in their system.
RE: Board of Directors approved letter going
out to MMS now:
December 9, 2002
Ms. R.M. “Johnnie” Burton
U.S. Minerals Management Service
Re: PWS-RCAC's Nov. 4, 2002 letter to MMS regarding the Joint Industry Project to
evaluate the effectiveness of dispersants in cold water at Ohmsett
Dear Ms. Burton:
The Prince William Sound Regional Citizens'
Advisory Council (PWS-RCAC) is an independent non-profit corporation whose
mission is to promote environmentally safe operation of the Valdez Marine
Terminal and associated tankers. Our work is guided by the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990 (OPA90) and our contract with Alyeska Pipeline Service Company.
PWS-RCAC's 18 member organizations are communities in the region affected by
the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill, as well as commercial fishing, aquaculture,
Native, recreation, tourism and environmental groups.
On November 4, 2002 PWS-RCAC sent the attached
letter to Joseph Mullin of the U.S. Minerals Management Service (MMS)
concerning the above referenced Ohmsett demonstration. Since we have not
heard back from Mr. Mullin, we are writing to again express our concerns.
The PWS-RCAC is a unique organization in that
Federal agencies are charged with consulting us on “all permits, site
specific regulations, and other matters governing the activities and actions
of the terminal facilities which affect or may affect the vicinity of the
terminal facilities.” OPA 90 also directs the PWS-RCAC to “review
relevant scientific work undertaken on behalf of any government entity
relating to the terminal facilities or crude oil tankers.”
Because the proposed joint industry study at
Ohmsett may have direct bearing on the local decisions regarding dispersant
use, our November letter to Mr. Mullin (attached), requested that
PWS-RCAC be consulted on the methodologies of any MMS dispersant research
applicable to our region. If this demonstration proceeds, PWS-RCAC will
undertake a thorough review including the provisions within OPA90. This
review will form the basis for a public information effort to correct any
overly broad Exxon/MMS claims such as what appeared in the Spring/Summer 2002
Ohmsett newsletter (attached).
PWS-RCAC recently spoke to the Alaska Regional
Response Team (ARRT) at its November 15, 2002 meeting. Our presentation
included a request that stakeholders join us in developing a credible wave
tank test based on mutually acceptable scientific protocols. Our
proposal was well received and the ARRT is reconvening its Science and
Technology Work Group to address both this issue as well as the short and
long-term toxicity of dispersants in Alaskan waters, especially Corexit 9527.
As we stated previously, we would certainly welcome and encourage the
participation of MMS in such a work group.
PWSRCAC has three major problems with the Ohmsett
dispersant demonstration as follows:
1) the demonstration avoids any
consideration of the physical characteristics of oil slicks in cold water that
may prohibit successful dispersion;
2) the oil is not weathered in place
on the test waters in real time; and
3) the water has not been changed
between test runs.
We repeat our previous recommendation that MMS
postpone its Phase II Ohmsett demonstration *
until after the Alaska Regional
Response Team has completed developing dispersant testing protocols. We
question the reasoning behind the Ohmsett Phase II demonstration and think
that it is unwise and counterproductive to proceed at this time. If this
demonstration proceeds as currently planned, it will lead to decreased
confidence in dispersants use in Alaska. PWSRCAC requests that MMS
join with us and the ARRT in working together to better understand how to
effectively use dispersants in Alaskan waters.
We would appreciate your response at your earliest
convenience, but we ask that you reply no later than December 16, 2002.
If you have any questions, please contact me or PWS-RCAC staff member Lisa
Ka'aihue at 907/277-7222 or kaaihue@pwsrcac.org.
toll free 800-478-7221 See, March, 2002 test in New Jersey *
Sincerely,
John S. Devens, Ph. D.
Executive Director
Attachments: 1)
November 4, 2002 letter from PWS-RCAC to Joseph Mullins, MMS
2) Page 6 of
the Spring/Summer 2002 Ohmsett Newsletter
3) RCAC
Observer Report of the March 2002 Ohmsett dispersant testing
CDR Mark Swanson, USCG MSO Valdez
*
All dispersants should be banned, what good do they do?
They
just ad poison to the oil;
they
make a bad situation worse.
Lobby
to ban all use of dispersants!
Are more lives
being compromised, in addition to damage to the environment?
From
the study of Inipol EAP 22, I conclude dispersants should NEVER be
used;
they
came into vogue based on false premises...
&
all we do is ad poison to our waters...
in
the end, the natural storms clean the oil spill residue...
anything
man does is little more than making a bad situation worse.
But,
if someone is making money...
even
if Exxon is making money on 'cleaning up its own disasters'
...
maybe they'll just keep on doing what they want to do?
- 'Mother Margaret'
This is a supplemental page of
this website: www.valdezlink.com/inipol