|
REPLY by 'Mother Margaret' I wonder how much money EXXON earned on their 'bad product' Why Exxon used a bad product * & How you would feel, if harmed by 2-butoxyethanol
The kind of dispersants used in 1989, 1990
in Prince Wm Sound
were very harmful.
RCAC has recently taken a position against using such dispersants I hope that the US Coast Guard & EPA will take note.
Nor use any 2-butoxyethanol products in
ballast water treatment, either.
And more thoughts:
a link to an article on the US federal appeals court's
decision. http://au.biz.yahoo.com/061212/30/10g1e.html
This is so sad.... punitive EVOS damages
They should
pay the full amount
RE: Punitive
damages
I hope their next
appeal backfires on them
Sound Truth and Corporate MYTH$:
The Legacy of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill
How to purchase a book?
for those who want to buy it?
Award-winning Sound Truth and Corporate Myths:
The Legacy of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill (2005) reveals the
new science showing that oil is much more toxic toxic than
previously thought to humans and wildlife. Sound Truth provides
critical new information
for people working in oil issues and educators.
Available on www.soundtruth.info
and amazon.com
Also with excerpts with workers ... &
interviews with some of them
Any others like Evan Lange?
"Yes."
At least they could have told him what chemical he should avoid and what health issues they did find ____________ So, if the punitive damages will be paid ... is that a for sure now?
"No. Exxon is expected to appeal to
the Supreme Court to argue that punitive damages should not apply
in this case."
Goes to people on the list already of oiled communities, right?
"Goes to 32,000 claimants in
court-approved Plan of Allocation in 1996.
They include fishermen and others who work
in the oiled region but who live Outside."
____________________
Favorite
Quotes and News Articles
*
|