Why Exxon used a bad product

RCAC position on dispersant use in Prince Wm Sound *

 
 steven pedigo <stevenosei@msn.com
February 28, 2006
valdez@alaska.com  or
2 butoxy ethanol

   The use of 2 butoxy ethanol is still prevalent today, The region 6 rrt pre-approved the use of Exxon's Corexit 9527 dispersant which contains 2 butoxyethanol. We do know of one instance where there was over spray on a coast guard vessel and the dispersant caused chipping of the marinem paint. We can only imagine what happened to coast guard personnel on the vessel. We will give you a comparison of OSE II and dispersants, and we thought we would let you know that approximately 50 linear feet of beach was cleaned up in Homer, Alaska utilizing OSE II.

    Exxon tested OSE II during the first winter, and Dr. Brown from University of Alaska Fairbanks called us after seeing the test by Exxon and told us that OSE II was the very best product that Exxon tested. But they never came to us to use OSE II. They were using the Valdez spill to test the French product Inipol which contained 2 butoxy ethanol which you have pointed out.  

The main reason Exxon pushed this toxic nightmare is because they spent a large amount of money procuring the rights to this horrible product

A Worker's Comment

Initial Effects of using Inipol EAP 13 or 22?  *

The spill that is still there could be easily cleaned up in one summer if they prestaged OSE II before summer and started applying using eductor systems, do not hold your breath waiting for Exxon to do the right thing. Exxon and big oil have found a unique way to rid themselves of the responsibility for their spills and in our comparison that follows you will see their ingenious way of shirking responsibility. feel free to cony

    The OSEI Corporation would like to discuss the merits of using OSE II instead of dispersants. Dispersants do not clean up spills they merely sink the spill increasing the spills area of impact. In the case of Exxon's product corexit 9527 or others in the corexit line, they have an extremely toxic solvent to get rid of the fingerprint; so once the oil is sunk their responsibility sinks with it. The problem is that when you apply dispersants they start sinking the oil and this will adversely impact the species that are swimming through the sinking oil. Then as the oil settles on the bottom, the dispersed oil then starts adversely affecting the bottom dwellers and then the currents move the oil into tar balls and this affects other areas on the bottom or the tar balls roll up on beaches affecting species that live off of intertidal zones and or humans. Dispersants do not clean up spills they move them!

    Our product is a unique bioremediation product that when it is applied to the oil (by the way there is no limited opportunity to apply OSE II) OSE II immediately attacks the molecular structure of the oil breaking it into smaller droplets. The oil is then rapidly detoxified reducing the toxicity to the environment (which is why spills are supposed to be clean up) and the adhesion properties are broken down so that overhead flying species can fly into the OSE II oil mixture and the oil will not adhere to them, the flammability is reduced and the oil is caused to stay afloat. So in the time it takes a dispersant to start sinking oil OSE II renders the oil virtually harmless. The next false roadblock usually put up against bioremendiation is that it takes to long. It will take OSE II 7 to 21 days depending on the weather and oil to convert all the oil to Co2 and water. I submit to you this is exceedingly faster than dispersant that do not ever clean up oil.

    With OSE II the spilled oil slowly disappears as the oil is broken into smaller droplets and the molecular structure starts breaking down. There is one great benefit using OSE II in that as the oil becomes a detoxified food source for bacteria, you actually increase the food chain along the entire chain in time, instead of sterilizing the entire area with an overly toxic solvent and oil.

    There is another benefit for the response personnel. OSE II has been ingested on U.S. television with no adverse affects. The Exxon dispersants with 2 butoxy ethanol in them; if they get on your skin they can cause kidney failure and death, with OSE II you can wash your hands with it with no adverse affect.

    OSE II eliminates fuels flammability and there is no risk of explosion or fire when storing OSE II. With the correxit dispersants they are a fire hazard, and an explosion hazards. OSE II is the common sense choice, so will your group make the best common sense choice for the environment and the responders.

     OSEI Corporation would like to introduce you to our environmental clean up product/process for numerous types of spills. See OSE II at www.osei.net

     OSE II is used for most hydrocarbon based contaminants, including pesticides, PCB's, TCE's, PCE's, fuels, including Aviation gas, and oils refined, or unrefined. OSE II is used for soil spills, for ground water, for concrete, and asphalt spills, for bilge water, and ballast water, for tanks, and cargo hull cleaning, for fresh, and salt water spills, in estuaries, and intertidal zones, for manufacturing process clean up, in refineries, including water process clean up, in waste water treatment plants, for waste water pump stations, for AFFF clean up, and for deicing agent.

    OSE II has been successfully tested by the U.S. EPA, by the U.S. Navy in Florida as a deck cleaner, and is listed by the Navy for all 5 branches of the U.S. military as part of book 18" into an on-line database referred to as DENIX the defense Environmental Network, and was tested by the Navy Health group at Aberdeen proving ground. The U.S. Navy has successfully used OSE II in the San Diego bay for over 3 years cleaning up fuel spills reducing there clean up costs by 90%. All 5 branches of the military have used OSE II for over 14 years.

    OSE II has been remediating spills since 1989, and is now distributed in 35 countries. OSE II will permanently clean up a spill, and does not cause secondary clean up problems, like hauling contaminants to another location.

    OSE II is the easy to use cost-effective means to quickly address 100% of a spill. OSE II will save Time, Money, and Labor associated with spill clean ups.

    We hope you will utilize OSE II in the future. Please contact us after you have had a chance to review our web site.

Sink the 2-butoxyethanol?

What about the herring of 1993 ? http://www.valdezlink.com /inipol/no.htm  

Next time - Don't let Exxon run the show

Favorite Quotes & News Articles of that day  *

Causes a-typical migraine headaches ... and ... and ... and

some photos of the Exxon Valdez oil spill

What Navy ships were there?    -   1989 in Valdez?

2-butoxyethanol is no respecter of persons

Lots of people are affected - This housekeeper?

Doctors say they do not know what the fatigue of CFIDS is!

Many times ... & for years the blood work 'looks OK'


The chemical doctors need to know about:

.. the reason we are seeing more ALS ... Parkinson's ...  MS ....
Both EVOS workers & 'gulf war vets' have it as a common exposure
 
The cause of many cancers, birth defects, miscarriages ... and DIABETES
The cause of Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome  *
The cause of brain tumors, leukemia, NHL, Soft tissue sarcomas/lung cancers
The cause of much depression, suicidal tendencies - Nervous System damage
Causes ulcerative skin (internal/external) Wounds don't heal
Causes many autoimmune issues - SKIN ... other
(the cause of skin tags for baby boomers?)
 
The fatigue is autoimmune hemolytic anemia  (worker suggestions)
What we call the FLU is 2-butoxyethanol poisoning  *

    

Margaret Diann  907-835-3135  e-mail

Box 233 Valdez, AK 99686

 
 

What cost, war? * for Americans

C6H14O2/CH3(CH2)2CH2OCH2 CH2OH  msds + MSDS   *

NJ Hazardous Substance Fact Sheet  2-BUTOXY ETHANOL 4 pages pdf  1989 link replaced

NJ Hazardous Chemical Fact sheet on 2-butoxyethanol pdf 6 pages 2001

 
Why did EPA shelve Inipol EAP 22 after the Exxon Valdez oil spill cleanup ...
But allow Corexit (the non selected chemical/s) for widespread use?
 
The first has 12% 2-butoxyethanol
Corexit has 38%
 
409 is a 'mini Corexit'
http://www.valdezlink.com/learn.htm#home

British Petroleum cares about its workers - Banned 409 on its site in Prudhoe Bay

 
I suspect my friend, Helen, was health damaged from use of Lysol Tub 'n Tile & other cleaning products  *
 
A Col in USAF has had trouble breathing after using Simple Green at home ... for just 15 minutes ... What happened to Audrey's husband  
"I found a website with your address regarding Simple Green and Butoxyethanol. My husband had a chemical exposure in 2000. He was using Simple Green off and on for about 45 minutes. He started feeling real sick."
Help?   Doctors are taking a serious look at glyconutrients
 

 

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE VIA INTERNET COMMUNICATION IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.

What is used to cleanup ballast water?

a ballast water treatment could be an exposure to 2-butoyethanol?

 

Alyeska CRUDE OIL MSDS
 
Suspected Teratogens
All are or are suspected teratogens *

6-17-06

We have glaciers in & near Valdez, Alaska

This couple from Holland did some Ice Climbing with their own tour guide -

on the Valdez Glacier  *

Says a man from Tennessee, "How could this be the place of the Exxon Valdez oil spill?" *