Death of fishermen may put new light on EVOS appeal  

 
October 29, 2007

Dear David Oesting,

Even those not DIRECTLY exposed to the cleanup chemical of EVOS ... may be affected by the 2-butoyethanol in Inipol EAP 22 and in Corexit

 
The wind would blow it into their eyes off beaches!  Or they could be around the 'bioremediation' workers & be exposed second hand.  (The chemical is expelled in the respiration of those exposed and it gets into the eyes of others they hang out with)  Family members & people who lived in Valdez & worked in public places:  barber shop, bookkeepers, bank workers, the PUBS.
 
Family would notice personality changes
FATIGUE ... such as in 'gulf war syndrome' group
CFIDS & autoimmune issues and cancer is what this chemical causes
 
 
Have you heard that we have found the names of over 900 bioremediation workers from mid Aug, 1989?
If 70% of them are now dead ... and similar %age dead from the 'gulf war syndrome' group ... would be significant in itself
 
Since Exxon has delayed so long, there are other relevant issues
Like wrongful death
 
I met you in Valdez a few years ago
& talked to you about this chemical in common cleaning products
 
I know how to prove it now
 
www.valdezlink.com/re/sarah.htm#if

 Inipol's not much of a fertilizer considering it has a C:N:P ratio of 62:5:1 *

                        Next time, do not let EXXON run the show *

They were 'spray and washing' the beaches - not bugs eating oil - They made a bad matter worse.  One account says they put 230 tons of Inipol in the waters (poison!)  Find out if this chemical added to water increases the temperature (Often added into our air by industry ... this needs to be looked into)

Exxon should be additionally fined for the cleanup damages to the environment and to the people they harmed in the process:  not credited with the cost of it (for PR purposes primarily).  They received the PR they paid for.

Sincerely,

 

Margaret Diann, box 233, Valdez, AK 99686  907-835-3135

 

The EVOS workers would do our Nation a great service,

to point out the harm of this chemical ...

I recognize the pattern, and doctors & civilians can too

David W. Oesting

In re Exxon Valdez, Case No. A89-095-CV (HRH) (Consolidated), U.S. District Court, Alaska. Court-appointed Lead Counsel for 30,000 plaintiffs represented by 60 law firms in the consolidated proceedings for over 250 lawsuits, both class actions and direct actions, filed on behalf of fishermen, processors, Alaska Natives, landowners, businesses, and others injured as a result of the spill of 11.8 million gallons of North Slope crude oil into the coastal waters of Alaska by the T/V Exxon Valdez owned by Exxon Corporation and Exxon Shipping Company. A four month jury trial resulted in a verdict awarding plaintiff clients $297.0 million compensatory damages and $5.0 billion punitive damages.