|
What is the 'story' of the Exxon Valdez oil spill cleanup? / It was an experiment, plain 'n simple |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Inipol EAP 22 was selected for use of the products tried; it had 12% 2-BUTOXY ETHANOL; Corexit has 38% 2-butoxyethanol; however, EPA has banned use of Inipol Inipol EAP 22 was more of a surfactant than a fertilizer C:N:P = 62:5:1 that's bad *
2-butoxyethanol is the most prevalently found glycol ether (half the time this is the glycol ether in use) * * |
||||
|
Favorite Quotes and News Articles
|
||||
|
Corexit 9527 * as shown on a July, 2000 or later list- almost no info given CAS: 60617-06-3 * 6-14-92 only ingredient given is 2-butoxyethanol * Note Corexit 9580 comments from 8-1-89: www.valdezlink.com/inipol/corexit.htm Ethylene Oxide is the only ingredient given * Though not used other than experimentally during Exxon Valdez Oil Spill cleanup, * did it still have 2-butoxyethanol in it, too? Corexit 9554 1993 version *
Can you believe this? Exxon has switched to the most dangerous ingredient of Inipol EAP 22 & don't seem to be giving full information on it. Surely Exxon knows ingredients are not allowed to be proprietary after 1997 court ruling regarding such for pesticides! * So, the plan is to dump poison into our Alaska waters...hoping Exxon can come up with a money maker? What about the people? What about the marine life! *
Do NOT use Corexit for dispersant in oil spill cleanup * Decline of Herring - Thoughts March, 2009 / 20 year anniversary of the Exxon Valdez oil spill issues Herring numbers have leveled off & not spiked since about 1993 (?) and there have been no herring fished as a crop since 1995
(Find the Anemia that BUTYL / glycol ether causes) & these issues for people *
*Alyeska is still using Corexit; however, they are not able to utilize it like they want to for lack of the necessary permits. Thus a proposed plan to test Corexit in Alaska's ocean... over the objection of RCAC... that appropriate lab testing has not been done appropriately.
International
Chemical Safety Cards
|
|
ICSC |
CHEMICAL NAME |
CAS NO. |
||||||||||||
|
UN Haz Class: 6.1 *
R: 20/21/22-37
|
111-76-2 | |||||||||||||
| R20/21/22 Harmful by inhalation, in contact with the skin and if swallowed | ||||||||||||||
| Health Hazard | Reference(s) | |||||||||||||
| Recognized: | -- | |||||||||||||
| Suspected: | Cardiovascular or Blood Toxicant | ATSDR LADO MALA OEHHA-99 RTECS | ||||||||||||
| Developmental Toxicant | JANK | |||||||||||||
| Endocrine Toxicant | RTECS | |||||||||||||
| Gastrointestinal or Liver Toxicant | ATSDR RTECS | |||||||||||||
| Kidney Toxicant | RTECS | |||||||||||||
| Neurotoxicant | DAN RTECS | |||||||||||||
| Respiratory Toxicant | OEHHA-AREL RTECS | |||||||||||||
| Skin or Sense Organ Toxicant | OEHHA-AREL RTECS | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
155 |
R: 45-46-12-23-36/37/38 Also considered a poison |
75-21-8 |
||||||||||||
|
R46 |
R45 May cause cancer R46 May cause heritable genetic damage in humans. R12 Extremely flammable R23 Toxic by inhalation R36/37/38 Irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin May cause heritable genetic damage. |
|||||||||||||
| Health Hazard | Reference(s) | |||||||||||||
| Recognized: | Carcinogen | P65 | ||||||||||||
| Reproductive Toxicant | P65 | |||||||||||||
| Suspected: | Cardiovascular or Blood Toxicant | RTECS | ||||||||||||
| Developmental Toxicant | EPA-SARA JANK | |||||||||||||
| Gastrointestinal or Liver Toxicant | RTECS | |||||||||||||
| Kidney Toxicant | ATSDR RTECS | |||||||||||||
| Neurotoxicant | AEGL DAN EPA-HEN EPA-SARA KLAA OEHHA-2001 RTECS | |||||||||||||
| Respiratory Toxicant | EPA-HEN RTECS | |||||||||||||
| Skin or Sense Organ Toxicant | EPA-HEN KLAA RTECS | |||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
Contact * regarding Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Cleanup Workers